Strike (1925) - Sergei M. Eisenstein
I’m not exactly sure what to make of this film. I have to
admit I started feeling very restless and bored realizing that the entire hour
and half would in fact be dealing with a non-narrative strike. But I was impressed
that it was a true production and that this many people were involved in a
non-mainstream film. It felt very loaded in terms of the visual mockery of the
people in power. Their faces took on gruesome traits and the way that one of
the men pops up the table with all the alcohol when they’re supposed to be
considering the terms of the proletariat makes it clear how Eisenstein viewed
this class as ridiculous.
I also thought it was
very effective to juxtapose the man juicing the orange with the police trampling
the laborers. I felt the effect of the police more vividly because of that. I
thought the most avant-garde element, as I understand it, was the shot where
all the riff-raff pop out of the holes on the king’s land. It was interesting
how the film devolved into total chaos, starting with these strange characters.
Having the riot go on for so long at the end reflected the actual feeling of it
being never-ending for the people. I
felt ignorantly surprised with the way that it ended. I guess I’m used to
narrative films where, even when it’s a tragedy, there’s more of a denouement
lead out.
Odessa Steps
This scene showcased horrors of authority even more so than Strike, particularly with Eisenstein’s
decision to show the child being trampled. I like how he drew everything out,
like with the pram falling down the steps, because he created tension in an
artful way. I also appreciated how there was a never-ending stream of people
coming down the steps; it felt like the steps themselves went on forever.
No comments:
Post a Comment